Linguistic, Structural, Literary Criticism
| Last Updated: Jan 22, 2009 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Linguistic Criticism on John 8:1-11 | ||
| 1826 | S. T. Bloomfield | - a masterly defence! new! |
| 1848 | S. Davidson | - linguistic claims refuted |
| 1863 | H. Alford | - reviewed by Nicolson |
| 1896 | J. Burgon | - the classic defence! |
| 1917 | H. Cadbury | - 'Lukan theory' weak... |
| 1918 | H. L. Jackson | - state of scholarship |
| 1932 | A. T. Robertson | - scholarly hari kari |
| 1940 | A. Pink | - basic contextual evidence |
| 1950 | R. Heard | - methodology is useless! NEW! |
| 1994 | J. P. Heil | - internal evidence! |
| 1997 | M. Schneider | - more evidence! |
| 1998 | R. A. Culpepper | - NEW internal evidence! |
| 2000 | J. M. C. Scott | MORE internal evidence! |
| 2007 | A. W. Wilson | MORE internal evidence! |
The Original Case against John 8:1-11
from vocabulary and 'style' examined and refuted!
S. Davidson (1848) on 8:1-11 Pt II: - thoroughly critiqued
John Paul Heil
Professor of New Testament,
Curley Hall,
Catholic University of America,
Washington, DC
J. P. Heil (1994) on John 8:1-11 with new rejoinder
A.W. Wilson
examines both internal linguistic evidence,
and contextual evidence from John's Gospel:
Godet (1874) on John: Integrity of Christ's Discourses NEW!
BAG (1957) on NT Greek Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich
R.M. Grant (1963) on John 8:1-11 vocabulary, style sources
Nigel Turner (1972) on John an analysis of Johannine style
R. M. Fowler (1982) on Literary Criticism of the Gospels NEW!
New Linguistic Evidence favours Authenticity!
Why 'δε' is irrelevant in John - more claims implode
'ει μη' in John 8:1-11 - NOT a stylistic marker
New Structural Evidence for Authenticity Found!
Moses and John 8:1-11 - Thematic Structure discovered! NEW! Jan 2009
O.T. Quotation Structure in John - powerful new evidence
CHIASTIC Structure (2008) & Jn 8:1-11 - more new evidence!
Mount of Olives CHIASM - English Version!
Mount of Olives CHIASM - Greek Unicode
New Literary Evidence re: Authenticity
coming soon! Dec 2008
Reconstructions of John's Gospel Reviewed
Bultmann's rearrangement of John - critiqued
Anderson's Two-Edition theory - critiqued
Return to Onsite Main Page <-- Click Here to return.
Coming soon:
Lukanisms reassessed
John's Style: the current state of affairs
Unless otherwise stated, all original material of whatever nature created by Nazaroo and Mr. Scrivener and included on this Website and any related pages, including the website's archives, is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada License.
This website is an excellent educational resource and any information can be used and reproduced as long as the use of the information complies with the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada License.